Submit a preprint

Latest recommendations

IdTitle * Authors * Abstract * Picture * Thematic fields * RecommenderReviewers▲Submission date
04 Jun 2024
article picture

New generic name for a small Triassic ray-finned fish from Perledo (Italy)

A new study on the halecomorph fishes from the Triassic of Perledo (Italy) highlights important issues in Palaeoichthyology

Recommended by based on reviews by Guang-Hui Xu and 1 anonymous reviewer

Mesozoic fishes are extremely diverse. In fact, fishes are the most diverse group of vertebrates during the Mesozoic─just as during any other era. Yet, their study is severely underrepresented in comparison to other fossil groups. There are just too few palaeoichthyologists to deal with such a vast diversity of fishes. Nonetheless, thanks to the huge efforts they have made over the last few decades, we have come a long way in our understanding of Mesozoic ichthyofaunas. One of such devoted palaeoichthyologists is Dr. Adriana López-Arbarello, whose contributions have been crucial in elucidating the phylogenetic interrelationships and taxonomic diversity of Mesozoic actinopterygian fishes (e.g., López-Arbarello, 2012; López-Arbarello & Sferco, 2018; López-Arbarello & Ebert, 2023). In her most recent manuscript, Dr. López-Arbarello has joined forces with Dr. Rainer Brocke to tackle the taxonomy and systematics of the halecomorph fishes from one of the most relevant Triassic sites, the upper Ladinian Perledo locality from Italy (López-Arbarello & Brocke, 2024). 

Fossil fishes were reported for the first time from Perledo in the first half of the 19th century (Balsamo-Crivelli, 1839), and up to 30 different species were described from the locality in the subsequent decades. Unfortunately, this is one of the multiple examples of fossil collections that suffered the effects of World War II, and most of the type material was lost. As a consequence, many of those 30 species that have been described over the years are in need of a revision. Based on the study of additional material that was transferred to Germany and is housed at the Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, López-Arbarello & Brocke (2024) confirm the presence of four different species of halecomorph fishes in Perledo, which were previously put under synonymy (Lombardo, 2001). They provide new detailed information on the anatomy of two of those species, together with their respective diagnoses. But more importantly, they carry out a thorough exercise of taxonomy, rigorously applying the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to disentangle the intricacies in the taxonomic story of the species placed in the genus Allolepidotus. As a result, they propose the presence of the species A. ruppelii, which they propose to be the type species for that genus (instead of A. bellottii, which they transfer to the genus Eoeugnathus). They also propose a new genus for the other species originally included in Allolepidotus, A. nothosomoides. Finally, they provide a set of measurements and ratios for Pholidophorus oblongus and Pholidophorus curionii, the other two species previously put in synonymy with A. bellottii, to demonstrate their validity as different species. However, due to the loss of the type material, the authors propose that these two species remain as nomina dubia

In summary, apart from providing new detailed anatomical descriptions of two species and solving some long-standing issues with the taxonomy of the halecomorphs from the relevant Triassic Perledo locality, the paper by López-Arbarello & Rainer (2024) highlights three important topics for the study of the fossil record: 1) we should never forget that world-scale problems, such as World Wars, also affect our capacity to understand the natural world in which we live, and the whole society should be aware if this; 2) the importance of exhaustively following the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature when describing new species; and 3) we are in need of new palaeoichthyologists to, in Dr. López-Arbarello’s own words, “unveil the mysteries of those marvellous Mesozoic ichthyofaunas.”

References

Balsamo-Crivelli, G. (1839). Descrizione di un nuovo rettile fossile, della famiglia dei Paleosauri, e di due pesci fossili, trovati nel calcare nero, sopra Varenna sul lago di Como, dal nobile sig. Ludovico Trotti, con alcune riflessioni geologiche. Il politecnico repertorio mensile di studj applicati alla prosperita e coltura sociale, 1, 421–431.

Lombardo, C. (2001). Actinopterygians from the Middle Triassic of northern Italy and Canton Ticino (Switzerland): Anatomical descriptions and nomenclatural problems. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 107, 345–369. https://doi.org/10.13130/2039-4942/5439

López-Arbarello, A. (2012). Phylogenetic interrelationships of ginglymodian fishes (Actinopterygii: Neopterygii). PLOS ONE, 7(7), e39370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039370

López-Arbarello, A., and Brocke, R. (2024). New generic name for a small Triassic ray-finned fish from Perledo (Italy). PaleorXiv, bxmg5, ver. 4, peer-reviewed by PCI Paleo. https://doi.org/10.31233/osf.io/bxmg5

López-Arbarello, A., and Ebert, M. (2023). Taxonomic status of the caturid genera (Halecomorphi, Caturidae) and their Late Jurassic species. Royal Society Open Science, 10(1), 221318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221318

López-Arbarello, A., and Sferco, E. (2018). Neopterygian phylogeny: The merger assay. Royal Society Open Science, 5(3), 172337. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172337

New generic name for a small Triassic ray-finned fish from Perledo (Italy)Adriana López-Arbarello, Rainer Brocke<p>Our new study of the species originally included in the genus <em>Allolepidotus</em> led to the taxonomic revision of the halecomorph species from the Triassic of Perledo, Italy. The morphological variation revealed by the analysis of the type ...Fossil record, Systematics, Taxonomy, Vertebrate paleontologyHugo Martín Abad2024-03-21 11:53:53 View
18 Dec 2024
article picture

Simple shell measurements do not consistently predict habitat in turtles: a reply to Lichtig and Lucas (2017)

Not-so-simple turtle ecomorphology

Recommended by based on reviews by Heather F. Smith and Donald Brinkman

I am a non-avian dinosaur palaeontologist by trade with a particular interest in their palaeoecology. This can be an endless source of both fascination and frustration. Fascination, because non-avian dinosaurs are quite unlike anything alive today, warranting some use of creative license when imagining them as living animals. Frustration, because the lack of good, extant ecological analogues frequently makes reconstruction of their ancient ecologies an almost insurmountable challenge.

The Canadian Museum of Nature where I work has a good collection of Late Cretaceous turtles. I took an interest in these some years ago because it struck me that, despite the quality of our collection, relatively few people come to study them. I thought, "Someone should work on these. Why not me?" I figured studying a new fossil group would present a fun change of pace and perhaps a more straightforward object of palaeoecological reconstruction. After all, fossil turtles are a lot like living turtles, so how hard can it be? Right?

In 2018, I took a special interest in one recently prepared fossil turtle, which I determined to be a new species of Basilemys (Mallon and Brinkman, 2018). Basilemys held my interest because, although it is a relatively common form, there has been some debate concerning the palaeohabitat of this animal and its closest relatives, the nanhsiungchelyids. Some have argued for an aquatic habitat for these animals; others, for a terrestrial one. It seems that where one comes down on the issue depends on which aspect of ecomorphology is emphasized. If it is on the flat carapace, nanhsiungchelyids must have been aquatic; if it is on the stout feet, terrestrial. This is how I came to appreciate the numerous ecomorphological proxies (e.g., skull shape, shell shape, limb proportions) that are used in turtle palaeoecology and how incongruent they can sometimes be. So much for easy answers!

The present study by Evers et al. is a response to an original piece of research by Lichtig and Lucas (2017), who claimed to be able to use simple shell measurements (carapacial doming and relative plastral width) to accurately deduce/infer the habitats of living turtles and, by extension, fossil ones. In short, they found that terrestrial turtles tend to have more domed carapaces and wider plastra, yielding some unconventional palaeoecological reconstructions of particular stem turtles. Evers et al. take issue with several aspects of this study, including issues of faulty data entry, inappropriate removal of extant taxa from the model, and insufficient accounting for phylogenetic non-independence. By correcting for these overights, they find that the model of Lichtig and Lucas (2017) performs more poorly than advertised and that the palaeoecological classification it produces should be questioned. "The map is not the territory", as Alfred Korzybski put it, and this latest study by Evers et al. serves as an important reminder of that lesson.
Still, even if Lichtig and Lucas's model is overly simplistic, it is true that aquatic turtles, on average, have lower carapaces and narrower plastra, and that they have relatively lower skulls and longer toes. Surely, there is merit in each of these anatomical proxies, even if no single one predicts ecology with total accuracy. I would love to see a model that combines them all. Until then, Evers et al. have inched us closer to knowing what turtle morphology can (and cannot) tell us about habitat.

Thanks to D. Brinkman and H. Smith for their helpful reviews of the manuscript.

References

Evers, S. W., Foth, C., Joyce, W. G., and Hermanson, G. (2024). Simple shell measurements do not consistently predict habitat in turtles: A reply to Lichtig and Lucas (2017). bioRxiv, 586561, ver. 3 peer-reviewed by PCI Paleo. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.25.586561

Lichtig, A. J., and Lucas, S. G. (2017). A simple method for inferring habitats of extinct turtles. Palaeoworld, 26(3), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2017.02.001

Mallon, J. C., and Brinkman, D. B. (2018). Basilemys morrinensis, a new species of nanhsiungchelyid turtle from the Horseshoe Canyon Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Alberta, Canada. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 38(2), e1431922. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2018.1431922

Simple shell measurements do not consistently predict habitat in turtles: a reply to Lichtig and Lucas (2017)Serjoscha W. Evers, Christian Foth, Walter G. Joyce, Guilherme Hermanson<p>Inferring palaeoecology for fossils is a key interest of palaeobiology. For groups with extant representatives, correlations of aspects of body shape with ecology can provide important insights to understanding extinct members of lineages. The ...Evolutionary biology, Macroevolution, Morphological evolution, Morphometrics, Paleoecology, Vertebrate paleontologyJordan Mallon2024-04-19 13:31:59 View
23 Jan 2025
article picture

New data on morphological evolution and dietary adaptations of Elephas recki from the Plio-Pleistocene Shungura Formation (Lower Omo Valley, Ethiopia)

Of elephant teeth and plants: mesowear and dental adaptations do not track in Plio-Pleistocene elephants of the Shungura formation (Omo Valley, Ethiopia)

Recommended by ORCID_LOGO based on reviews by Steven Zhang and 1 anonymous reviewer

Bedane et al. (2024) provide a beautifully illustrated demonstration of the difficulties in using dental adaptation as proxies for the diets of elephants, which are in turn often used to determine the vegetation in an area. This study set out to assess mesowear, which is the relief on the teeth that forms due to abrasion by food, and therefore a good proxy of dietary composition in herbivores. The team was interested in testing whether this mesowear relates to morphological adaptations of hypsodonty (high-crownedness) and enamel thickness over a period of ~3.4–~1.1 million years in an elephant species (Elephas recki) commonly found in the Plio/Pleistocene of the Shungura formation (Omo Valley, Ethiopia). To answer this question, the team scored these metrics in 140 molars between ~3.4 and ~1.1 million years of age, separated into time bins. Their results show surprisingly low levels of variation in mesowear, indicating relatively low variation in diet that was overall mostly composed of graze (as opposed to mixed or browsing diets, which are softer). Hypsodonty and enamel thickness were correlated, but changed erratically rather than suggesting a trend towards a particular dietary adaptation. The exciting conclusion is that dental morphologies that we often consider to be adaptive to certain conditions are very slow to evolve, and that a wide variety of morphologies can support the survival of a species despite little variation in diet. For me as a functional evolutionary morphologist, this clear case of many-to-one-mapping is a timely reminder that evolution does not work either quickly or just on the one character complex I might be considering. And in terms of using elephant teeth as ecological proxies – this job clearly just got a little harder.

References

Bedane, T. G., Mackaye, H. T., and Boisserie, J.-R. (2025). New data on morphological evolution and dietary adaptations of Elephas recki from the Plio-Pleistocene Shungura Formation (Lower Omo Valley, Ethiopia). PaleorXiv, qexuf, ver. 4, peer-reviewed by PCI Paleo. https://doi.org/10.31233/osf.io/qexuf

New data on morphological evolution and dietary adaptations of *Elephas recki* from the Plio-Pleistocene Shungura Formation (Lower Omo Valley, Ethiopia)Tomas Getachew Bedane, Hassane Taïsso Mackaye, Jean-Renaud Boisserie<p style="text-align: justify;">The proboscideans, abundant and diverse throughout the Cenozoic, are essential terrestrial megaherbivores for studying morphological adaptations and reconstructing paleoenvironments in Africa. This new study of the ...Fieldwork, Fossil record, Morphological evolution, Morphometrics, Paleoecology, Paleoenvironments, Vertebrate paleontologyVera Weisbecker2024-04-24 13:32:58 View
12 Feb 2025
article picture

A new tuna specimen (Genus Auxis) from the Duho Formation (Miocene) of South Korea

Rare Miocene tuna fossil unearthed in South Korea

Recommended by ORCID_LOGO based on reviews by 2 anonymous reviewers

A newly discovered fossil of a tuna fish from the Miocene has been identified in the Duho Formation in Pohang City, South Korea (Suh et al., 2025). The new find, attributed to the genus Auxis, represents only the second valid fossil record of this genus globally, thus contributing to the understanding of evolutionary history within the Scombridae family (Collette and Nauen, 1983; Nam et al., 2021). 

The partially skeleton GNUE322001 consists of a few articulated caudal vertebrae preserving diagnostic features of the genus Auxis (Suh et al., 2025). Although it is not possible to compare the new find with the only fossil species known to date, †A. koreanus Nam et al., 2021, the significant difference in size suggests that it could be a different species. The fossil, preserved in fine-grained mudstone, also offers insights into taphonomic processes, suggesting that the specimen underwent significant decomposition in a low-energy sedimentary environment before burial.

The new record of Auxis supports interpretations of the Duho Formation as a pelagic and subtropical marine habitat, shaped by upwelling activities during the Miocene (Graham and Dickson, 2000; Kim and Paik, 2013; Nam et al., 2021). This discovery emphasizes the significance of upwelling zones in fostering biodiversity and highlights the value of fossil records in reconstructing prehistoric marine ecosystems (Lalli and Parsons, 1997; Wang and Lee, 2019).

References

Collette, B. B., and Nauen, C. E. (1983). Scombrids of the world: An annotated and illustrated catalogue of tunas, mackerels, bonitos, and related species known to date. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Graham, J. B., and Dickson, K. A. (2000). The evolution of thunniform locomotion and heat conservation in scombrid fishes: New insights based on the morphology of Allothunnus fallai. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 129(4), 419–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb00612.x

Kim, J., and Paik, I. S. (2013). Chondrites from the Duho Formation (Miocene) in the Yeonil Group, Pohang Basin, Korea: Occurrences and paleoenvironmental implications. Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 49(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.14770/jgsk.2013.49.3.407

Lalli, C. M., and Parsons, T. R. (1997). Biological oceanography: An introduction (2nd ed). Butterworth Heinemann.

Nam, G.-S., Nazarkin, M. V., and Bannikov, A. F. (2021). First discovery of the genus Auxis (Actinopterygii: Scombridae) in the Neogene of South Korea. Bollettino Della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 60(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.4435/BSPI.2021.05

Suh, D., Kim, S.-H., and Nam, G.-S. (2025). A new tuna specimen (Genus Auxis) from the Duho Formation (Miocene) of South Korea. bioRxiv, 605724, ver. 5 peer-reviewed by PCI Paleo. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.29.605724

Wang, Y.-C., and Lee, M.-A. (2019). Composition and distribution of fish larvae surrounding the upwelling zone in the waters of northeastern Taiwan in summer. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 27(5), article 8. https://doi.org/10.6119/JMST.201910_27(5).0008

A new tuna specimen (Genus *Auxis*) from the Duho Formation (Miocene) of South KoreaDayun Suh, Su-Hwan Kim, Gi-Soo Nam<p>A partially preserved caudal vertebrae imprint of a tuna was discovered from the Duho Formation (Miocene) of South Korea. This specimen was assigned to the genus <em>Auxis</em> and represents the second record of fossil <em>Auxis</em> found in ...Fossil record, Vertebrate paleontologyAdriana López-Arbarello2024-08-02 07:16:42 View
01 Oct 2021
article picture

Ammonoid taxonomy with supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms

Performance of machine-learning approaches in identifying ammonoid species based on conch properties

Recommended by based on reviews by Jérémie Bardin and 1 anonymous reviewer

There are less and less experts on taxonomy of particular groups particularly among early career paleontologists and (paleo)biologists – this also includes ammonoid cephalopods. Techniques cannot replace this taxonomic expertise (Engel et al. 2021) but machine learning approaches can make taxonomy more efficient, reproducible as well as passing it over more sustainable. Initially ammonoid taxonomy was a black box with small differences sometimes sufficient to erect different species as well as really idiosyncratic groupings of superficially similar specimens (see De Baets et al. 2015 for a review). In the meantime, scientists have embraced more quantitative assessments of conch shape and morphology more generally (see Klug et al. 2015 for a more recent review). The approaches still rely on important but time-intensive collection work and seeing through daisy chains of more or less accessible papers and monographs without really knowing how these approaches perform (other than expert opinion). In addition, younger scientists are usually trained by more experienced scientists, but this practice is becoming more and more difficult which makes it difficult to resolve the taxonomic gap. This relates to the fact that less and less experienced researchers with this kind of expertise get employed as well as graduate students or postdocs choosing different research or job avenues after their initial training effectively leading to a leaky pipeline and taxonomic impediment.

Robust taxonomy and stratigraphy is the basis for all other studies we do as paleontologists/paleobiologists so Foxon (2021) represents the first step to use supervised and unsupervised machine-learning approaches and test their efficiency on ammonoid conch properties. This pilot study demonstrates that machine learning approaches can be reasonably accurate (60-70%) in identifying ammonoid species (Foxon, 2021) – at least similar to that in other mollusk taxa (e.g., Klinkenbuß et al. 2020) - and might also be interesting to assist in cases where more traditional methods are not feasible. Novel approaches might even allow to further approve the accuracy as has been demonstrated for other research objects like pollen (Romero et al. 2020). Further applying of machine learning approaches on larger datasets and additional morphological features (e.g., suture line) are now necessary in order to test and improve the robustness of these approaches for ammonoids as well as test their performance more broadly within paleontology.

 

References

De Baets K, Bert D, Hoffmann R, Monnet C, Yacobucci M, and Klug C (2015). Ammonoid intraspecific variability. In: Ammonoid Paleobiology: From anatomy to ecology. Ed. by Klug C, Korn D, De Baets K, Kruta I, and Mapes R. Vol. 43. Topics in Geobiology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 359–426.

Engel MS, Ceríaco LMP, Daniel GM, Dellapé PM, Löbl I, Marinov M, Reis RE, Young MT, Dubois A, Agarwal I, Lehmann A. P, Alvarado M, Alvarez N, Andreone F, Araujo-Vieira K, Ascher JS, Baêta D, Baldo D, Bandeira SA, Barden P, Barrasso DA, Bendifallah L, Bockmann FA, Böhme W, Borkent A, Brandão CRF, Busack SD, Bybee SM, Channing A, Chatzimanolis S, Christenhusz MJM, Crisci JV, D’elía G, Da Costa LM, Davis SR, De Lucena CAS, Deuve T, Fernandes Elizalde S, Faivovich J, Farooq H, Ferguson AW, Gippoliti S, Gonçalves FMP, Gonzalez VH, Greenbaum E, Hinojosa-Díaz IA, Ineich I, Jiang J, Kahono S, Kury AB, Lucinda PHF, Lynch JD, Malécot V, Marques MP, Marris JWM, Mckellar RC, Mendes LF, Nihei SS, Nishikawa K, Ohler A, Orrico VGD, Ota H, Paiva J, Parrinha D, Pauwels OSG, Pereyra MO, Pestana LB, Pinheiro PDP, Prendini L, Prokop J, Rasmussen C, Rödel MO, Rodrigues MT, Rodríguez SM, Salatnaya H, Sampaio Í, Sánchez-García A, Shebl MA, Santos BS, Solórzano-Kraemer MM, Sousa ACA, Stoev P, Teta P, Trape JF, Dos Santos CVD, Vasudevan K, Vink CJ, Vogel G, Wagner P, Wappler T, Ware JL, Wedmann S, and Zacharie CK (2021). The taxonomic impediment: a shortage of taxonomists, not the lack of technical approaches. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 193, 381–387. doi: 10. 1093/zoolinnean/zlab072

Foxon F (2021). Ammonoid taxonomy with supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms. PaleorXiv ewkx9, ver. 3, peer-reviewed by PCI Paleo. doi: 10.31233/osf.io/ewkx9

Klinkenbuß D, Metz O, Reichert J, Hauffe T, Neubauer TA, Wesselingh FP, and Wilke T (2020). Performance of 3D morphological methods in the machine learning assisted classification of closely related fossil bivalve species of the genus Dreissena. Malacologia 63, 95. doi: 10.4002/040.063.0109

Klug C, Korn D, Landman NH, Tanabe K, De Baets K, and Naglik C (2015). Ammonoid conchs. In: Ammonoid Paleobiology: From anatomy to ecology. Ed. by Klug C, Korn D, De Baets K, Kruta I, and Mapes RH. Vol. 43. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3–24.

Romero IC, Kong S, Fowlkes CC, Jaramillo C, Urban MA, Oboh-Ikuenobe F, D’Apolito C, and Punyasena SW (2020). Improving the taxonomy of fossil pollen using convolutional neural networks and superresolution microscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 28496–28505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007324117

Ammonoid taxonomy with supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithmsFloe Foxon<p>Ammonoid identification is crucial to biostratigraphy, systematic palaeontology, and evolutionary biology, but may prove difficult when shell features and sutures are poorly preserved. This necessitates novel approaches to ammonoid taxonomy. Th...Invertebrate paleontology, TaxonomyKenneth De Baets Jérémie Bardin2021-01-06 11:48:35 View